LDN Wrestling will host this event |
Mountevan's rules consist of a round system (similar to Boxing) and instead of one-fall to decide the outcome, the victor is required to win two falls (best two of three falls). The only way to achieve a one-fall victory would be if you were awarded a disqualification decision. Finding out this information worried me hugely.
The legends of World of Sport; Big Daddy and Giant Haystacks |
Even today I go to shows that consist of the American style; one-fall match. This has become the norm. WoS wrestling ended in 1988 and in its absence the WWF(E) (and to a lesser degree, WCW) filled the void and wowed worldwide audiences ever since. A whole generation has passed since the 'golden age' of British wrestling. As a result of this I feel like this revival show might confuse, alienate and generate more mockery from non-wrestling fans and fence-sitters. People know the American-way, if you will, and people generally don't like change.
Recently, I have befriended a former referee and MC of the WoS era, Lee Bamber. He gave me his view of the possibility of a WoS wrestling return:
"God Yes, I would love to see more shows under the traditional Moutevan's rules banner and I think that the public would enjoy the "fair sport" style of wrestling that most have either forgotten or have never seen. There are a couple of promoters who still employ the old British way; John Freemantle's "Premier Promotions" is probably the best known for this, but even the mighty Brian Dixon still bills the odd "old school" or traditional contest to add light and shade to his very successful shows.
As someone who remembers the "golden days" of the 1970's and worked within the Moutevan's rules when I turned pro in 1985, I still regard this way as THE way to present a wrestling show. As in today's high flying, gimmick laden, rhetoric blasting USA style; which is fine; the referee is seemingly there just to count the falls and nothing else . He has no authority, no respect, no power; it's all show, spot, show, spot... anything goes.
When I referee now in a non-"old school" show I never enjoy it as much. The traditional way can tell a better story, build up a contest and have more legitimate credibility than the spot-fest of the US style. You can build up more tension if the referee has a part to play: He is in charge - will he disqualify the heel?
For me, the fundamental differences and the way I still like to work are: If a wrestler goes outside the ring he has until 10 to get back in. Here's the big one; once a hold or move is broken with a wrestler on the floor the referee starts the count; the opponent can't just grab him again if it's not part of the same move. You can build up tension by shouting "break the hold" when on the ropes not just launch into a 5 count... and best of all is the "Public Warning" system; two warnings issued by the referee for rule breaking, and a disqualification called on the third; this helped tell the story of the match, build up tension and make it something the fans could follow.
In the latter days of Joint Promotions, referees were known to the fans as well as the wrestlers; third men such as Max Ward, Brian Crabtree, Dave Rees, Joe D'Orazio and Peter Szackacs were known and respected because they had a part to play in the bouts unlike today when the referee seems to be there just to look like a ref. The old timers would return and the current fans would be curious if we had a new "old" show. I'm all for it and if it does happen, can I referee please?"
Doug Williams and Magnus (Nick Aldis) have made great strides in the USA |
"Watching "the game" evolve over the years I would say that it was Mountevan's rules everywhere until domestic wrestling came off our screens in 1988 and as the American presentations took over, UK promoters started dabbling with the odd "American Rules" or "American style"contests from about 1989 with the Stateside way becoming the norm from around 1995 (these dates are very approximate).
I would guess that any promoter setting up from about the year 2000 has run with almost exclusively the US style. As mentioned before, "Premier Promotions" are 100% old school, Brian Dixon's "All Star" sometimes presents a traditional contest, and Sanjay Bagga's LDN has some World of Sport matches and "legends" evening. Most of the other smaller, newer outfits may not even have a clue about pre-1988 televised wrestling.
To today's wrestling audience, and especially the kids, a traditional style bill would seem alien BUT if you promote it as such and get a good MC to explain on the night that it's an evening of traditional rules British wrestling - the style that impressed and influenced the rest of the world - you would be on to a winner with its USP (unique selling point).
Yes for many it would be alien, and it has to be said that in 2013, Mountevan's rules is NOT a true reflection of the UK scene today, but it's good to be different. Take a mix of the historic and traditional and give it a lick of paint; "tart it up" for 2013 and you could be onto something big. I think you will be surprised at the amount of support you will get for it."
My talks with Lee really opened my eyes to different possibilities and that this might be a positive way to go. I also approached a friend of mine from Pro Evolution Wrestling (Pro EVW), Karl Timmis, about his views on the matter:
"A one-off show is great for nostalgia purposes. Personally, I can see it doing the current business good and bad in equal portions. It may deter people away from current British promotions as they'll see it as the same as they just saw on TV. It could equally encourage people to local shows, again expecting to see what they saw on TV. This is great because although they may not get what they expected, it gives the promotion the opportunity to get their brand of entertainment across; this can only be a good thing for those involved. If the fans don't return in the future, then that company has not entertained them well enough."
Karl's view really made sense to me. From a wrestling promotion's point of view, all publicity is good publicity - it will put extra bums in seats - if only for the short term - and if that promotion entertains well enough then people will return. As Karl points out, though, it could have a negative effect if people are expecting the Mountevan's rules style.
If this is going to be a one-off show, then I suppose we, as wrestling fans, should take the win. With the dominance and influence of the American promotions over the last twenty-five years it was always going to be difficult to compete. This potential return to terrestrial TV is a massive step in the right direction for British wrestling and who knows, maybe it could be the start of changing peoples views and preconceptions about wrestling with more and more new fans getting along to their local (and not-so-local) shows and igniting British wrestling into a new 'golden age'.
One of the UK's best: El Ligero |
One step at a time, eh? Progress will happen - there's too much talent in the UK for people NOT to take notice of the thing we love.
Support British Wrestling
@jimmosangle
No comments:
Post a Comment